PDA

View Full Version : The view from La-La Land as written by Chicken Little ...


ViRedd
05-28-2006, 06:34 AM
The End Of Civilization As We Know It

by Bill Press (former California Democratic Party Chairman)

May 25, 2006

I know it’s futile to dwell in the land of what-might-have-been. But these days we just can’t help it.

If only they’d counted all the votes in Florida in 2000. . . . If only we lived in a country where the person who got the most votes won the election. . . . If only the Supreme Court still respected states’ rights. . . . If only the man who deserves to be president were in the Oval Office, how much different — how much better — things would be.

We wouldn’t be locked in an endless, unwinnable war in Iraq; under President Al Gore, we wouldn’t have gone there in the first place. We wouldn’t be held hostage by big oil companies, with no alternative energy options on the table, when the price of oil topped $70 a barrel. We wouldn’t be saddled with a massive budget deficit. And, most of all, we wouldn’t be sitting on our hands and doing nothing about the most serious environmental crisis ever faced by humankind.

George W. Bush will go down in history as the worst American president ever. For things he’s done, yes: launching a pre-emptive war; presiding over the biggest spending and worst budget deficits ever; widening the gap between the rich and poor; destroying America’s standing in the world. But the most serious strike against Bush 43 will be what he hasn’t done: his total failure to act on global warming.

Failure to act? Actually, it’s worse than that. George W. Bush won’t even acknowledge that global warming exists — certainly not warming caused by human activity. How the leader of the Free World could remain so ignorant on so critical an issue boggles the mind. But then again, we are talking about Incurious George.

Actually, Bush wouldn’t have to travel far if he really wanted to become informed. He could begin by watching Al Gore’s new movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” which dramatically illustrates that global warming is real, is manmade, and — without a major shift in public policy and private behavior — will soon develop into a planetary threat of biblical proportions. Gore has said he hopes his documentary will prove to “an action movie in the truest sense”: motivating people to get off their butts. But Bush has already told reporters he doubts he’ll have time to catch Gore’s film. He’s too busy riding his bike.

Instead, Bush could read the excellent “Field Notes from a Catastrophe” by Elizabeth Kolbert, who traveled around the world to document evidence of global warming. As she reports, January 2006 was the warmest January in recorded history; April 2006, the warmest April. The world’s glaciers are disappearing. The Arctic and Antarctic ice caps are melting. Polar bears are falling through the ice and drowning. In Micronesia, islands are being abandoned because of rising sea levels. In Russia, entire cities are sinking through the permafrost. In Costa Rica, several species offrogs, unable to adapt to climate change, have become extinct. In Alaska, native Inuit villages are being relocated inland because the shoreline is eroding. And her book is only 164 pages long.But of course expecting George W. Bush to read any book at all is asking a lot.

OK, then all Bush has to do is chat with some of his fellow born-again Christians. Many leading conservative Christians, led by Pastor Rick Warren of the Saddleback mega-church in Lake Forest, Calif., have organized to demand individual and government action on global warming. The need to act, they argue, is a moral imperative: “Millions of people will die in this century because of climate change, most of them our poorest global neighbors.”Failure to act, they agree, is immoral.

If he doesn’t trust preachers on scientific matters, Bush need only talk with his one friend in the world, Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has consulted the world’s leading scientists, and warns that the threat posed by climate change is even greater than previously thought. We must act within seven years to reverse the trend, Blair argues, or face global catastrophe: rising sea levels, loss of fisheries and crops, spread of tropical diseases, coastal cities underwater, and more severe weather patterns like we saw last year with Hurricane Katrina.

In brief, Bush has no excuse for his ignorance or indifference. The evidence of global warming is so overwhelming, only a fool would fail to recognize the threat.

Elohim is plural
05-28-2006, 08:22 AM
...somehow we have to make environmentalism profitable...the largest polluters won't stop unless the money is right...too bad they're also in control of western governments...

...i fear the warnings will not be headed...
EIP

ViRedd
05-29-2006, 01:37 AM
Ummm ... the largest polluters would be China, Mexico, India and other Third World countries.

Vi

Roscoe
05-30-2006, 03:33 AM
You're right Vi,
China, India, (other developing world countries) are/will be the biggest polluters in the world.
It would help for us to have influence over these countries. Bush went to India last month and traded nuclear technology for mangoes. Not really a bad thing considering that nuclear is clean energy. If only we could figure out what to do with the waste. Still, its difficult for us to affect any policy or treaties with other countries when America's cred is swirling down the toilet.
Kyoto was not fair for us and other developed countries. But we must help get the big polluters on a new track before they build their country's energy plan around fossil fuels like we did for 100 years.
Instead of spending 400 billion dollars on Iraq (oops, too late), how about a new "JFK space race" kind of project to find and develop new energy sources like Thomas Friedman has suggested? I don't agree on his means (raising gas tax). Maybe Vi's liberetarian mind can help us out with some suggestions for funding such a project.
http://www.stopglobalwarming.org/sgw_read.asp?id=647181202006

ViRedd
05-30-2006, 06:03 PM
Things will change when the consumer demands change. Its already starting to happen. Alternate fuel sources are being seriously discussed in Washington now. The auto makers are getting on board. Millions of dollars are being pumped into the Midwest for ethenol production. These millions are not going to Middle Eastern countries to buy oil. The Environmental extremists, now out of favor, have pretty much gone silent on nuclear energy development, new refineries and oil exploration.

Americans love thier big cars and big-block engines ... but not at $3.50+ per gallon. I still have confidence in Man's mind, working hand in hand with the free market, to come up with a viable solution.

Elohim is plural
05-30-2006, 06:59 PM
...well it makes sense that china and india are the biggest polluters, considering they comprise almost one third of the planets population...either way, forcing big business to change would be alot easier than forcing everyone else to do the right thing...a lot less businesses than people...
EIP

Green Supreme
05-30-2006, 07:15 PM
Third world countries as polluters?Seems this could also be due to first world taking advatage of lower third world standards.Some poor coutries will do all it takes to be productive.Letting enviromental issues take the hit.Their people are also taken advantage of,working for almost nothing just to have some money coming in.I mean really,do we think they would be capable with out money from countries like the US taking advantage.Just curious what you all think.Peace GS

capt carnuba
05-30-2006, 09:39 PM
Ethanol isn't a salvation. It's many times the resource hog of the petroleum economy. That's not even touching the idea of the land it will eat up and the other economic spinoffs that will negatively result.

Elohim is plural
05-31-2006, 02:31 AM
...ethenol does seem like a pr band-aid...i like bio-diesel more...

...did you here that china has imposed a tax on disposable chop-sticks to help slow de-forestation...hehe...chopsticks...
EIP

The Cannarchist
05-31-2006, 02:44 AM
Sounds like time to buy shares in that Suntan lotion company......

ViRedd
05-31-2006, 03:36 AM
Man ... a billion people, each disposing of six chop sticks per day ... man, that comes out to exactly .... ummm ... a hell of a lot of chop sticks. *lol*

Green Supreme ...

The Third World countries aren't polluting because the US is taking advantage. They are polluting because of lack of technology and totalitarian governments and the despots who run them sucking the countries dry.

Vi



Vi

capt carnuba
05-31-2006, 03:54 AM
Biodiesel raises the same negative issues. The problem is essentially our mode of conveyance and reasons for the nescessity.

Elohim is plural
05-31-2006, 04:03 AM
...i was under the impression that corn produced ethenol required much more resources than bio-diesel...but whatever, i don't drive...
EIP

ViRedd
05-31-2006, 05:58 AM
I envision millions of acres dedicated to hemp. :)

Vi

Elohim is plural
05-31-2006, 06:00 AM
...word...
EIP

The Cannarchist
05-31-2006, 10:46 AM
edited.AF not logging me out.